Understanding the importance/impact of the project
I’ve never participated in qualitative research before. In such research projects, different stakeholders (people whose opinions are relevant to the project’s objective) are interviewed with carefully constructed questions. Then, researchers “code,” or analyze and synthesize their responses in order to draw meaningful conclusions. Therefore, this process involves a lot of reading and writing to figure out: What is the most common opinion? What are the unpopular opinions? What are the possible social influences behind such opinions? What actions can be taken to solve the problems described? By whom?
I like how Dr. Suneeta Krishnan (the principal investigator who runs the project) approaches this research project because all data are analyzed with potential solutions in mind. The conclusions drafted from the study are not impractical, useless statements that describe the social environment behind the problem–rather, they consist of practical, action-oriented recommendations that different stakeholders can act on to battle cervical cancer. This way, the research report clearly explains what steps the readers (the government officials, doctors, health organizations) in their different roles can take.
We will submit the report the ACS and Suneeta’s team will also present the key findings in person to the different stakeholders so that effective prevention plans can be designed and improved upon. Unlike previous basic science lab research I’ve been involved with, Suneeta’s research takes a direct approach that actively delves into the problem and brainstorms potential solution. That’s why, even while writing portions of the report instead of personally witnessing the effects of cervical cancer, I still feel engaged with the issue and believe that my (and everyone else’s) contribution will produce some good.
Recent Comments